![]() And the agent testifying had never used the hardware himself, but was relating stories from colleagues who had. Attorneys maintain that using such a cracking device has a risk of destroying the data on the phone. The judge didn’t buy it, partly because in another case in which Apple is a player and has made waves, U.S. The agent was brought to testify that it was trivial enough to extract the data with an IP Box, and thus that it was of no consequence whether or not that passcode was obtained improperly as they could just crack the phone. ![]() ![]() The issue in the case was whether compelling the courier to give his passcode before he had been notified of his rights meant the evidence should be suppressed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |